Legal Opinion

Christ v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13955PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this cause after decision by the District Court of Appeal (First District, Division Two) [287 Pac. 560, 561]. After further consideration of all of the issues involved we adopt the following portions of the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, of which Mr. Presiding Justice Nourse was the author, as the opinion pro tanto of this court:

“This is an original proceeding in mandamus to require the Superior Court to issue a commission for the taking of testimony of two witnesses upon letters rogatory issued out of a court of record of Guatemala.
“The letters…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. S.F. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API