Legal Opinion

Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2004No. 03-15007PublishedCited by 408 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.

Nano Maldonado appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which raises several First Amendment challenges to California’s Outdoor Advertising Act. The district court held that, insofar as Maldonado’s constitutional claims were ripe for review, it lacked jurisdiction to review them under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The district court also held that some of Maldonado’s challenges were precluded under California law because of Maldonado’s failure to raise the claims in an earlier state proceeding. Based on these findings, the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by408 opinions

  1. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Brodheim v. CryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Brown v. ValoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Courtney Bird v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Madero Pouncil v. James TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

403 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API