Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2004No. SB-03-0113-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a hearing officer concluded that Richard E. Clark violated Rule 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, Ethical Rule (ER) 8.4(c) (stating that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to “engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation”) and ER 8.4(d) (prohibiting lawyers from “engag[ing] in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice”). The hearing officer recommended censure, one year of probation, and an order of restitution to Clark’s former client, Edward…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, TarletzArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Republic Insurance v. FeidlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Matter of OwensArizona Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Robert Matthew BristolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CariniOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Lane's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API