Legal Opinion

Republic Insurance v. Feidler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 27, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 91-0504PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.

Michael Feidler was injured by Tom Davis, an insured under a Republic homeowners insurance policy. Feidler appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Republic in a declaratory judgment action brought by the insurer. The judgment declared that the Republic policy does not cover injuries sustained by Feidler when Davis stabbed him. The superior court’s judgment rests on its finding that an intentional acts exclusion in Republic’s policy excludes coverage.

The central issue presented is whether Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 13-807 1 and Davis’s no contest…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Serrano Picón v. Multinational Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2023
  2. PUEBLO SANTA FE TOWNHOMES OWNERS'ASS'N v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. LambertonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Harvest v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FlaggSuperior Court of Delaware · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API