Legal Opinion

Worldwide Insurance Group v. Klopp

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 16, 1992PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

In this appeal, we are called upon to decide whether an arbitration provision in an automobile insurance policy is void as against public policy. The provision in question permits either party to demand a trial de novo from an uninsured/underin-sured arbitrators’ decision only if the amount of the arbitrators’ award exceeds state financial responsibility limits. The appellant, Worldwide Insurance Group (Worldwide), appeals from a decision of the Chancery Court granting the appellee’s, Ruth Klopp’s (“Klopp”), motion for entry of judgment based on the arbitration award. Worldwide…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Phoenix Insurance v. RosenIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Reed v. Farmers Insurance GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
  5. Klussman v. Cross Country BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API