Legal Opinion

Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1998No. 4:96-3360-22PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CURRIE, District Judge.

CONTENTS

I. BACKGROUND. 01 00 00

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY . cn 00 00

III. HOA’S § 4 MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION.

A. Hooters’ Arguments to Compel Arbitration.

1. The Making of the Arbitration Agreement .

2. Misrepresentation Issues .

3. Unconscionable Adhesion Contract.

4. Fairness of Arbitral Procedures & Rules.

5. Interpretation of Arbitral Rules.

B. Phillips’ Arguments Opposing Arbitration .

1. General.

2. Absence of Essential Terms of Arbitration Agreement.

3. Misrepresentation of Arbitral Process as Fraud in the Inducement.

4. Selective Incorporation of Unconscionable Rules…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Holloman v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Vandeventer v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API