Legal Opinion
Klussman v. Cross Country Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 2005No. A108572PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
Defendants Cross Country Bank (Bank), its credit card servicing company Applied Card Systems, Inc. (ACS), and Rocco A. Abessinio appeal from an order denying their motion to compel arbitration. Most of the issues originally raised on appeal have been settled by our Supreme Court’s recent decision in Discover Bank v. Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148 [30 Cal.Rptr.3d 76, 113 P.3d 1100] (Discover Bank). Consequently, the principal issue remaining for decision is the proper application of the choice of law rules outlined in Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v. Superior Court (1992) 3…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Pokorny v. Quixtar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.