Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Geiss

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1932No. Docket No. 4455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in an action to quiet title, refusing to quiet appellant’s title against respondent’s.

On January 2, 1912, Irwin Bechtel and his wife were the owners of certain real property in Los Angeles, California, to which appellant is seeking to quiet his title. On that date the Bechtels mortgaged said property to Michael Geiss for $1,000; this mortgage became due and payable January 2, 1915. In 1914 Geiss disappeared and has never since been heard from. Before his disappearance, however, he left the note and mortgage with the Guaranty Trust…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Larkin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Colby v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Gwinn v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Federal Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Neustadt v. SkernswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API