Legal Opinion
Neustadt v. Skernswell
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1955No. Civ. No. 16345PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The main question is whether or not this action, commenced October 31, 1950, is barred by the statute of limitations.*
Plaintiff seeks his alleged share of a sum of money which represents the proceeds of the sale of real property which stood in the name of defendant Skernswell but in which plaintiff claims to have had a one-half interest.
The sale was conducted pursuant to an interlocutory decree in a suit for the partition of said real property which plaintiff brought against defendant Skernswell in 1940. After said sale, the interlocutory decree -was reversed upon appeal.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Neustadt v. SkernswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Neusted v. SkernswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Atlas Finance Corp. v. KennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Morse v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956