Legal Opinion

Faxon v. All Persons

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1913No. S.F. No. 5964PublishedCited by 52 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing in Bank was ordered after judgment in Department One. The court was, and still is, entirely satisfied with the disposition by the department of every point, save one, arising on the appeals. The hearing in Bank was ordered to enable the court to give further consideration to the one question which it regarded as doubtful, viz., whether the plaintiff, under the facts, was precluded from obtaining a decree quieting her title against the outlawed mortgage of the defendant bank, without offering to pay the amount of such mortgage. Except for its discussion of this question,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. King v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. System Investment Corp. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API