Legal Opinion

Laursen v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1990No. A8804-02156; CA A60750PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict for conversion that awarded general and punitive damages. We affirm.

Defendants Jeanne and Ted Morris are husband and wife. Jeanne wrote a book on numerology. Her husband compiled the manuscript and organized and entered it on a computer. Plaintiff is a book designer. He works with an author’s manuscript and makes decisions concerning the size and style of type, placement and size of headings, size and shape of margins, length of lines and spaces between them and the numerous other factors that go into producing a finished book. After the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Young v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Morrow v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Robertson v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Spaid v. 4-R Equipment, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API