Legal Opinion

Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 3, 2008No. 021111858; A134284PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

This case involves a dispute between plaintiff, the landlord of a warehouse, and defendant, 1 who had a security interest in merchandise stored in that warehouse. Defendant appeals from a limited judgment awarding plaintiff $220,411 in damages for breach of contract and $84,091.33 in prejudgment interest. He alleges that the trial court erred in ruling that the contract was supported by consideration, that it was not ambiguous, that plaintiff adequately pleaded a claim for prejudgment interest, and that defendant’s counterclaims for conversion and intentional interference with economic…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Milne v. Milne Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Department of Human Services v. C. Z.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. S. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. Pacificorp v. Northwest Pipeline GPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API