Legal Opinion

Spaid v. 4-R Equipment, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2012No. 06CV0275MA; A146613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for age discrimination under ORS 659A.030 and wrongful discharge.1 A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $200,000 in “[l]ost back wages and benefits” and $10,000 in noneconomic damages. Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest on the back pay award. We affirm.

We review the trial court’s denial of an award of prejudgment interest for errors of law. Tasaki v. Moriarty, 233 Or App 51, 55, 225 P3d 68 (2009). The pertinent facts are procedural and are not in dispute. In his amended complaint, plaintiff asserted claims for age…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holman Transfer Co. v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Krieg v. UNION PACIFIC LAND RESOURCES CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Shepherd v. Hub Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  2. Davis v. F. W. Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Element Materials Technology Food US LLC v. KahlDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API