Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Sullenger
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 12, 1992No. CR90-50423; CA A67394PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*228RICHARDSON, J.
The City of Dallas appeals, under ORS 221.380, from the trial court’s order in arrest of judgment, entered after defendant was convicted of interference with police officers and police equipment in violation of section 5.240 of the city code:
“(1) No person shall interfere with a police officer in performance of his or her duty.
“(2) ‘Interfere’ includes, but is not limited to:
“(a) Physical contact with a police officer, vehicle, animal, or item of police equipment, when the contact substantially limits the officer’s ability to act in an official capacity.
“(b) Verbal abuse or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Harlow v. ClowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Portland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- City of Portland v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- City of Eugene v. KrukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- City of Dallas v. SullengerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Corp. v. Metro Gov't of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000