Legal Opinion

City of Eugene v. Kruk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1992No. 91-50006; CA A71272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction under Eugene Municipal Code § 4.907 (EC § 4.907) for “Interferring [sic] with a Police Officer.” She contends that the trial court erred in overruling her demurrer, because the municipal ordinance is preempted by state law. We agree and reverse.1

One morning in September, 1990, at about 3:00 a.m., defendant and her extended family were awakened by a commotion on the front lawn. Defendant’s brother, Romeo, who occasionally stayed at defendant’s home, was yelling at Officer Dragt and pointing his finger at the officer’s face. Both Romeo and Dragt were standing in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Portland v. LodiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Eugene v. KrukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API