Legal Opinion
Dudek v. Umatilla County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 15, 2003No. 2002-048; A119050PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioners 1 seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision affirming Umatilla County’s grant of a partitioning request. The county’s decision included a determination that a portion of the Umatilla County Development Ordinance (UCDO) 2 need not be applied to the partitioning. The applicant before the county, Danny R. Smith (respondent), 3 sought to partition 20 acres located six miles south of the City of Pendleton into three lots, one of ten acres and two of five acres. The property is zoned for rural residential use and has a two-acre minimum lot size. The effect of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James Knight v. Metro Gov't of NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- West Linn Corporate Park LLC v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West LinnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Ass'n v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Ass'n v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.