Legal Opinion

State v. Ardolino

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 21, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Robert Ardolino appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, Kravchuk, C.J.) denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Ardolino contends that the court erred because post-trial enhancement of the audio tape recording of an interview the police conducted with Ardolino reveals that the transcript of the recording presented to the jury at trial was inaccurate and allowed the State to unfairly characterize what was on the recording in its closing argument. Because Ardolino had possession of a copy of the original recording 18…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ArdolinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. State v. LundSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. State v. DechaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. State v. PriestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. State v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CooksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. State of Maine v. Jason TwardusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  3. State v. SchmidtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Estate of FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  5. Ardolino v. Warden, Maine State PrisonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API