Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Jason Twardus

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 6, 2013No. Docket Yor-11-440PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.

[¶ 1] Jason Twardus appeals from a decision of the trial court (Brennan, J.) denying his two motions for a new trial following his conviction of murder, 17-A M.R.S. § 201(1)(A) (2012), after a jury trial. Twardus argues that the court erred and abused its discretion in concluding that neither the State’s alleged failures to disclose evidence pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), nor the discovery of new evidence after trial pursuant to M.R.Crim. P. 38, entitled Twardus to a new trial. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

[¶ 2]…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Joshua T. WilliamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. State of Maine v. Nicholas W. GagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. State of Maine v. Gregory NisbetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. State of Maine v. Gregory S. OlahSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. State of Maine v. Matthew C. Reed-HansenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API