Legal Opinion

State v. Priest

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Michael Priest appeals from his conviction of robbery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (1983), and aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983), (Cumberland County, Perkins, /.), claiming that the trial court erred in excluding testimony of a purported exculpatory statement, insufficiency of the evidence, and error by the trial court in denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

I

THE TRIAL COURT’S RULING UNDER M.R.EVID. 804(b)(3)

At trial, the defendant sought to introduce testimony of his girlfriend and his mother that Frank Cook had made an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. State v. HoltSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. State v. BardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BoobarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. State v. DechaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. State v. Ho TaiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. State v. BoucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. State v. LamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API