State v. Priest
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Michael Priest appeals from his conviction of robbery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (1983), and aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983), (Cumberland County, Perkins, /.), claiming that the trial court erred in excluding testimony of a purported exculpatory statement, insufficiency of the evidence, and error by the trial court in denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
I
THE TRIAL COURT’S RULING UNDER M.R.EVID. 804(b)(3)
At trial, the defendant sought to introduce testimony of his girlfriend and his mother that Frank Cook had made an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. HoltSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. BardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BoobarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. DechaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State v. Ho TaiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State v. BoucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. LamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.