Legal Opinion

Borden v. City of Salem

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTER, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages allegedly sustained when she was attacked by a dog used by the police department of the City of Salem in law enforcement work. The trial judge granted a *41nonsuit on the ground that the dog was being used in the performance of a governmental function. Plaintiff appeals.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff the evidence tends to prove the following facts. Plaintiff with her husband and a party of relatives and friends, after spending the evening at a tavern, went to the China Cafe in Salem early on a Sunday morning in April,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wilson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Adams v. City of ToledoOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jaco v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hunt v. Hazen, Adm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Kathren v. OlenikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Audette v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Abelseth v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Stroda v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API