Borden v. City of Salem
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTER, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages allegedly sustained when she was attacked by a dog used by the police department of the City of Salem in law enforcement work. The trial judge granted a *41nonsuit on the ground that the dog was being used in the performance of a governmental function. Plaintiff appeals.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff the evidence tends to prove the following facts. Plaintiff with her husband and a party of relatives and friends, after spending the evening at a tavern, went to the China Cafe in Salem early on a Sunday morning in April,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Wilson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Adams v. City of ToledoOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Jaco v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Hunt v. Hazen, Adm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Kathren v. OlenikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Audette v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Abelseth v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Stroda v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.