Legal Opinion

People v. Schlaiss

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 24, 1988No. 2-86-0903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

Defendant, Gerald Schlaiss, was convicted of battery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 12 — 3(a)(1)) after a bench trial in the circuit court of Lake County. On appeal, defendant contends that he was denied counsel because his representation by an unlicensed law student violated Supreme Court Rule 711 (107 Ill. 2d R. 711). We reverse and remand the cause for a new trial.

Defendant was charged by information with the offense of battery when he allegedly caused bodily injury to Janice Schlaiss by striking her in the face. A second information charged the defendant with having violated a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. KrantzIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Seattle v. RatliffWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. DoddIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Denzel W.Illinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. BrighamIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. DwyerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. People v. TrulyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Tate v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API