Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Arkansas
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 3, 1978No. 76-5856PublishedCited by 2,282 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
Petitioners, codefendants at trial, made timely motions for appointment of separate counsel, based on the representations of their appointed counsel that, because of confidential information received from the codefendants, he was confronted with the risk of representing conflicting interests and could *477not, therefore, provide effective assistance for each client. We granted certiorari to decide whether petitioners were deprived of the effective assistance of counsel by the denial of those motions. 430 U. S. 965 (1977).
I
Early in the morning of June 1, 1975, three men entered a Little Rock,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,282 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
2,277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.