People v. Denzel W.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman
Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Thomas, Kilbride and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Freeman dissented, with opinion, joined by Justice Burke.
OPINION
This consolidated appeal raises the issue of whether a defendant’s right to counsel is violated where defense counsel fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 711 (210 Ill. 2d R. 711). Specifically, counsel in each of these cases failed to file the accused’s written consent to participation in the defense by a nonattorney senior law student or law graduate (a 711 law student). In Denzel W., respondent was adjudicated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Jonathon C.B.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- State v. LodingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- In Re Jonathon CBIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. HokeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.