Legal Opinion

People v. Denzel W.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2010No. 107003, 107112PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Thomas, Kilbride and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Freeman dissented, with opinion, joined by Justice Burke.

OPINION

This consolidated appeal raises the issue of whether a defendant’s right to counsel is violated where defense counsel fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 711 (210 Ill. 2d R. 711). Specifically, counsel in each of these cases failed to file the accused’s written consent to participation in the defense by a nonattorney senior law student or law graduate (a 711 law student). In Denzel W., respondent was adjudicated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re Jonathon C.B.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. State v. LodingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In Re Jonathon CBIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. HokeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API