Legal Opinion

Gainsburg v. Garbarsky

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1930No. 22390. Department TwoPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

Respondent brought this action against the appellant, Rose Leff G-arbarsky, as administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of Isadore M. Leff, deceased, to recover $5,050 claimed to be due as support money awarded for the care of Janet Leff, she being the minor child of respondent and Isadore M. Leff, deceased.

The complaint alleges the marriage of respondent and Isadore M. Leff; the birth of their child, Janet; alleges that the child was, at the time of the commencement of the action, thirteen years of age, in the custody of, and solely dependent upon, respondent for her maintenance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stone v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nicholson v. NearyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gardine v. CotteySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Ditmar v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Koon v. KoonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hornung v. Estate of LagerquistMontana Supreme Court · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API