Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bradley v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1997No. 94-2680PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The issues in this case are (1) whether the commission’s order denying appellee’s claim for TTD satisfies the requirements of Noll, supra; and (2) if the order complies with Noll, whether the commission abused its discretion in denying appellee’s claim for TTD.

In Noll, we stated in the syllabus that “[i]n any order of the Industrial Commission granting or denying benefits to a claimant, the commission must specifically state what evidence has been relied upon, and briefly explain the reasoning for its decision.” The order must make it apparent “from the four corners of the decision that there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Bradley v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Jackson Tube Services, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Schottenstein Stores Corporation v. Indus. Commiss., 07ap-1066 (5-7-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Akron Paint & Varnish, Inc. v. GullottaOhio Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API