Legal Opinion
Schottenstein Stores Corporation v. Indus. Commiss., 07ap-1066 (5-7-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2009No. 07AP-1066PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Relator, Schottenstein Stores Corporation, has filed this original action requesting that this court issue a writ of mandamus ordering respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio ("commission") to vacate its order which granted permanent total disability ("PTD") compensation to respondent Haskell Hysell ("claimant"), and ordering the commission to deny said compensation.
{¶ 2} This matter was referred to a magistrate of this court pursuant to Civ. R. 53 and Loc. R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. The magistrate examined the evidence and issued a decision, including…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Domjancic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Eberhardt v. Flxible Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Bonnlander v. HamonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. Cugini v. Timken Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State ex rel. Tradesman Internatl. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State ex rel. Cook v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.