Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1998No. 95-1279PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

An Industrial Commission TTD award is an abuse of discretion for which mandamus is the remedy where no evidence of record establishes the claimant’s eligibility. State ex rel. Bradley v. Indus. Comm. (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 239, 242, 673 N.E.2d 1275, 1277. For the reasons that follow, we hold that no evidence attributes Richards’s medical condition to his lumbosacral strain and that the commission abused its discretion by awarding him TTD. Accordingly, we reverse and grant the writ.

The receipt of TTD “rests on a claimant’s inability to return to his or her former job as a direct result of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Pretty Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Bradley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Floyd v. Formica Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Beyer v. Autoneum N. Am. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State ex rel. Koepf v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Heilman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API