Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Coast Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1938No. Civ. 2205PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action to establish and recover a one-half interest in 480 acres of oil land in the North Dome of the Kettleman Hills oil district in Kings County, California. Judgments went for defendants and plaintiffs have appealed.
The several parties each present numerous separate arguments in support of their respective positions, either supporting or attacking the validity of the judgments. To seriously consider any considerable number of them would stretch the length of this opinion beyond all reason and could serve no useful purpose in reaching a decision of the ease.
The trial court found…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Arnold v. Universal Oil Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Payne v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.