Legal Opinion

Long v. Young

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 11, 1947No. 5233PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bland, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

Appellant, Long, has here appealed from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding appellee, Young, priority of invention defined by three counts which are claims in appellant’s patent copied by Young for interference purposes. Although Long’s patent issued while Young’s application was pending, Young is the senior party.

Neither party took testimony, and ivpon Long’s being required to show cause why judgment on the record should not be entered against him he came forward with a motion to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malm v. SchneiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Kliesrath v. KeslingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Oliver Kenneth KelleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Louis H. Segall v. Marion W. Sims, Ezra C. Hill and Aaron M. KrakowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Weiss v. RoschkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Masciarelli v. FoersteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API