Legal Opinion

In re Boudreau

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 2001No. 2000-B-3158PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*429ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

_JjPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises from a joint petition for consent discipline filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) and respondent, Raymond Earl Boudreau, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law ‘in the State of Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

Hogan Matter

On January 20, 1999, Herman Hogan retained respondent for a $2,000 “non-refundable retainer fee” to handle a succession matter. Subsequently, respondent failed to complete the work and failed to communicate with his client, despite his client’s repeated efforts to contact him. While…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. In re PowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. KilgarlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. In re HernandezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. In re EstessSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re SzubaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  2. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. In re WaltzerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. In re WhartonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. In re BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API