Legal Opinion

In re Szuba

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 5, 2001No. 2001-B-1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LPER CURIAM. *

This disciplinary matter stems from eleven counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Jay J. Szuba, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

Patt Matter

In March 1997, Robert Patt retained respondent to pursue a pending civil suit against Mr. Patt’s former employer for unpaid sales commission funds. Respondent agreed to undertake the representation, because the original attorney handling the case for Mr. Patt was moving out of town. However, respondent did not enter into a written contract with the *42clie…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In re PowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re WaltzerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. In re TurissiniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. In re WhiteheadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. In re BarriosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  5. In re McNeelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API