Legal Opinion

In re Estess

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 8, 1999No. 98-B-2741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.*

This attorney disciplinary matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, Rudolph Estess, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

According to the stipulation of facts entered into by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”), respondent was admitted to the bar in 1987 and began practicing with his father-in-law. His father-in-law died in 1992, and respondent worked as a solo practitioner, primarily doing oil and gas law.

Also in 1992, respondent was diagnosed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  2. In re HernandezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. In re CicardoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. In re LaurentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. In re WiltySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API