Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Wharton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 17, 2003No. 2003-B-1816PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from two sets of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Sheila Ann Wharton, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Two sets of formal charges were filed against respondent by the ODC. The first, bearing the disciplinary board’s docket number 01-DB-034, was filed on April 4, 2001 and encompasses four counts of misconduct. The' second set of formal charges, 02-DB-013, was filed on February 7, 2002 and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. In re BrancatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. In re LaqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. In re PittmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API