Legal Opinion

In re Broussard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 30, 2002No. 2002-B-1670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

LPER CURIAM.

This matter arises from a petition for consent discipline submitted by respondent, Francis C. Broussard, following the filing of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”).

UNDERLYING FACTS

This proceeding involves two separate counts of misconduct. The facts, as stipulated to by the parties, are as follows:

Bálsamo Matter

Respondent represented Steve Balsamo in a workers’ compensation matter. During the representation, Mr. Balsamo was hired by a construction company which was partially owned by respondent. Mr. Balsamo was injured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In re ReedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. In Re KellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. In Re SpruelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In Re: Francis C. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API