Legal Opinion

State v. McCoy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1968PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Defendant has appealed from a conviction of the crime of rape. The sole question is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress incriminating evidence found by the police in defendant’s automobile. Search of the automobile and seizure of the evidence were without a warrant and, defendant contends, violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment.

The prosecutrix is a Cuban refugee who was living in Portland at the time of the alleged crime. According to her testimony the defendant, whom she had never seen before, came to her apartment, lured her into his *162automobile…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. ElkOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API