Legal Opinion

State v. Keith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1970PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The defendant, Frank Keith, appeals from a judgment of conviction upon trial by jury of the crime of assault and robbery being armed with a dangerous weapon. The principal question presented on his appeal deals with the right of the police to search, without first obtaining a warrant, the interior of an automobile which had been seized by the police at the time they arrested the defendant.

Two Portland detectives, Vigna and Frostad, were on patrol on the evening of October 22, 1967. They had a report of an armed robbery of a grocery store on the preceding evening in which the two male robbers…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API