State v. Lewis

Six questions of law are asserted in this appeal in support of certain contentions of error in connection with the trial.

The first proposition of law set forth by appellant is that the warrantless seizure of his automobüe, which was parked on a private parking lot one-half block from the place of his arrest, was not incident to his arrest and therefore violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

*127At appellant’s trial, evidence was introduced to the effect that paint samples taken from the exterior of his car after it was seized were similar to paint…