Legal Opinion
State v. Flores
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 13, 1984No. 10-81-05891; CA A22413; SC 28913PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*619GILLETTE, J.
In this case involving criminal convictions for ex-convict in possession of a firearm and possession of a controlled substance, we are once again presented with an occasion to discuss an aspect of Oregon’s developing state law of search and seizure. We previously applied federal law, including Oregon cases interpreting federal law, to affirm these convictions. State v. Flores, 58 Or App 437, 648 P2d 1328 (1982). The Supreme Court accepted review and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of Oregon constitutional principles announced in State v. Caraher, 293 Or 741,…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. RidderbushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. FeslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.