Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1956No. 36378PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The first special ground of the amended motion for new trial complains of the following excerpt from the charge: “Now, gentlemen of the jury, I charge you further in connection with the burden of proof that when the processioning and the return and the plat are admitted in evidence, that makes out what is known as a prima facie case for the petitioner, and when that is introduced in evidence and admitted in evidence, as has been done in this case, then the burden shifts to the protestant to prove her contentions by what is known as a preponderance of the evidence. So, gentlemen, in this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Payne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Hill v. SnellingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Dixie Feed & Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Carter v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Fraser v. KichlineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Peacock v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Tolbert v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API