Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Boatright

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1966No. 23266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

It is the position of the appellant that where one of the coterminous landowners contends the dividing line between his land and the land of the opposite party is the “time original lot line,” he can not establish the line as having-been acquiesced in for the statutory period of time.

Code § 85-1602 provides: “acquiescence for seven years, by acts or declarations of adjoining landowners, shall establish a dividing line.” The fact that the line described in the plaintiff’s petition as extending along a stated course from one point to another is also alleged to be a land lot…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Osteen v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Riley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  4. Tietjen v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Veal v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cothran v. BurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Sledge v. Peach CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Phelps v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API