Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Kichline

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1963No. 40261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In his first special ground on motion for new trial, protestant acknowledges that the trial judge instructed the jury on correct principles of law relating to establishing a boundary line by acquiescence by coterminous owners for more than seven years (Code § 85-1602), or by adverse possession for the same period (Code § 85-1603). The protestant alleges, however, that the judge erred in instructing the jury to apply the portions of the charge they deemed applicable and to disregard the inapplicable portions.

The case of Long v. Robertson, 41 Ga. App. 712 (154 SE 464),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Payne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Boyd v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Long v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Wolk v. NicholsArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Martell v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API