Legal Opinion

Hill v. Snellings

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1930No. 19991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Belt,, J.

1. In the trial of a processioning case, deeds of conveyance comprising a part of the chain of title of one of the parties and describing a boundary as a certain branch, when tendered in evidence in behalf of the party who claimed under them and who alleged that such branch was the true divisional line, were not inadmissible and subject to be excluded upon objection that the language in each as to boundary constituted a mere declaration by the maker and was not binding on other persons, it appearing that the deeds were tendered not as documents binding upon the objecting party, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. King v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Brantly v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  4. Wooten v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Elkins v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SheltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Boyd v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Boatright v. TyreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API