McCollum v. Thomason
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Under the Civil Code, § 3823, a landowner dissatisfied with a line run and marked by processioners and a surveyor between him and a coterminus owner may file his protest thereto, specifying his objection and the true line as claimed by him, and the papers, including the protest, shall be returned to the superior court for trial. The verdict and the judgment shall be framed to meet the issue tried and decided. The issue in such a case is not necessarily confined to the question of whether the line as marked by the processioners should be sustained, but it is permissible for the protestant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Price v. GrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Stewart Bros. v. Randall Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Fitzpatrick v. PauldingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Windsor Forest, Inc. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Pierson v. M. M. Bus CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Jeter v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Reynolds v. KinseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Twilley v. TwilleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.