Legal Opinion
Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. Grasso
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 22, 1933No. 9013PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
Volker Grasso, appellee herein, brought this suit against the Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines, a corporation, and the Universal Casualty Company, also a corporation. He sought damages for injuries sustained by him as a result of a collision between the automobile he was driving and a truck belonging to the defendant freight lines. Grasso further alleged that the casualty company had issued to the freight lines a casualty insurance policy required by the laws of this state, and the regulations of the Railroad Commission. He also alleged the insolvency of the freight lines.
A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McFaddin v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. McLeanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. AndrewsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Kemper v. Police & Firemen's Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Enders v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. ShuddeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.