Legal Opinion

J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. Andrews

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1929No. 1206—5220PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of Case.

ÜRITZ, J.

We copy the following statement of the case from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals:

“This suit was instituted by the appellee, who will hereinafter be designated plaintiff, against J. M. Radford Grocery Company, hereinafter styled Radford. Radford filed its answer and cross-action, in which it made Herbert Cockrell and C. C. Abbott, operating under the name of South Plains Coaches, Inc., parties defendant, and seeking recovery over against them, in the event the plaintiff recovered against it. Plaintiff then filed his amended petition, in which he made Abbott…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. ZangTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Houston T. C. R. Co. v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Boaz v. White's Auto StoresTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Standard v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. GrassoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API