State Ex Rel. Brundage v. Eide
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Carl E. Brundage, defendant below, challenged the constitutionality of an order entered by Judge Donald A. Eide of Aukeen District Court. This order required him to pay the fee of an attorney appointed to defend him at the time of arraignment as an indigent defendant, if he could later do so without financial burden, within 6 months after the arraignment. A summary judgment in favor of Brundage was entered by the trial court and the state appeals.
The issue before us is whether the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel is unconstitutionally impaired by the district court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Myrick v. Board of Pierce County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.