Legal Opinion

State v. Hess

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1975No. 43726PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Defendant was convicted of grand larceny by embezzlement from a combination grocery store and gasoline station which he had been managing. He appealed to the Court of Appeals which affirmed the conviction, but set aside a condition of probation requiring payment of attorney’s fees incurred in providing him counsel as an indigent. State v. Hess, 12 Wn. App. 787, 532 P.2d 1173 (1975). The defendant petitioned for review on two *52issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged offenses and (2) whether the failure of trial counsel to subpoena a witness constituted a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. AmorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DeVincentisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API