Legal Opinion

In re VanDenBossche

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2000No. 99-1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio, VanDenBossche must establish by clear and convincing evidence his “present character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission.” Gov.Bar R. I(12)(C)(6); In re Application of Kemp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 274, 276, 703 N.E.2d 769, 771. Evidence of a pattern of disregard of the laws of Ohio or of other states and a failure to provide complete and accurate information concerning the *161applicant’s past reflect adversely on an applicant’s present character, fitness, and moral qualifications. Gov.Bar R. I(11)(D)(3)(f) and (g). In other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re KeitaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re Application of KempOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re NerrenOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re PiroOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re DickensOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In re Application of CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re MeffordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re Application of VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API