Legal Opinion

In re Application of Kemp

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. 98-1647PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio, the applicant must establish by clear and convincing evidence his “present character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.” Gov.Bar R. I(12)(C)(6); In re Application of Mitchell (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 153, 154, 679 N.E.2d 1127, 1128. Evidence of an existing and untreated chemical dependency reflects adversely on an applicant’s present character, fitness, and moral qualifications. Gov.Bar R. I(11)(D)(3)(b).

After reviewing the evidence, we adopt the findings of the board. Kemp’s untreated and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re NemecOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re RudolphOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re Application of KempOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re Application of VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API