Legal Opinion

In re Nerren

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1997No. 97-409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

As we said in In re Application of Keita (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 46, 47, 656 N.E.2d 620, 622, “Applicants for admission to the Ohio Bar must establish by clear and convincing evidence that their prior conduct justifies the trust of clients, adversaries, courts and others with respect to the professional duties owed to them.” Applicant’s professional conduct which warranted her suspension from the practice of law in Tennessee, her personal conduct involving convictions *324for contempt and for falsification, and her lying to courts, together with blame of third parties for her personal failings,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re KeitaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re Application of NerrenOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re Application of VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API